Limited Exclusion And Desist Orders Were Issued Against STIIIZY

The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a final ruling in the 337 investigation (337-TA-1392) on “Oil Vaporizing Devices and Its Components”, determining that the related import and sales activities constitute infringement and violation of multiple US patents, and has decided to issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) and Cease and Desist Order (CDOs) against the defendant STIIIZY, Termination of the investigation.

Key points at a glance
• The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) has made a final ruling in the 337-TA-1392 investigation, determining a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
• The products involved are oil vaporizing devices, its components, and products containing the same
• The USITC has decided to issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) prohibiting the importation of infringing products into the United States
• USITC simultaneously issues cease and desist orders (CDOs) against two defendants and announces the termination of the investigation
• During the presidential review period, the import bond for the infringing products involved is set at 100%

According to the announcement of the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC), the ITC found a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in its investigation number 337-TA-1392 “Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components There, and Products Containing the Same” and decided to take remedial measures.
The announcement shows that ITC will issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) to prohibit unauthorized infringing oil vaporizing devices, its components, and products containing such products from entering the US market; At the same time, cease and desist orders (CDOs) were issued against the two defendants. The investigation of this case is concluded with the ruling.
According to the announcement, this case was initially filed on March 6, 2024, involving US patent numbers 11369756, 11766527, 11369757, and 11759580.
The defendants include STIIIZY (STIIIZY IP LLC, STIIIZY, Inc., etc.) and ALD (ALD Group Limited, ALD Hong Kong Holdings).

In terms of procedural progress, the Administrative Judge (ALJ) made a final initial determination (FID) on March 6, 2025, stating that it did not constitute a 337 violation on grounds such as “has not satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement.”; Subsequently, ITC conducted a review of the relevant conclusions and, after being remanded for retrial, ALJ determined on July 18, 2025 that the complainant met the domestic industrial and economic requirements.

Original reference: files of stiiizy ALD violation of section 337

The background about R. J. Reynolds Renault 337 Investigation Raid 9 US Vape Distributors

This is a lawsuit against a leading vape company.
My personally believe it is even a lawsuit against Chinese vape manufacturers.
This will be an unchangeable outcome.